Sunday, February 27, 2011

Float Like a Butterfly

I don’t really know why “Stings” has gained my attention to the degree it has, but since opening Ariel I have certainly read it the most.


So the “two ways of interpreting the poem.”
1. Literal.

She, presumably Plath, is working with a man over a bee hive:

“Bare-handed, I hand the combs.
The man in white smiles, bare-handed,
Our cheesecloth gauntlets neat and sweet,
The throats of our wrists brave lilies.
He and I

Have a thousand clean cells between us,
Eight combs of yellow cups,
And the hive itself a teacup,
White with pink flowers on it,
With excessive love I enameled it”


She is concerned for the health of the hive, specifically the queen:
“Brood cells gray as the fossils of shells
Terrify me, they seem so old.
What am I buying, wormy mahogany?
Is there any queen at all in it?

If there is, she is old,
Her wings torn shawls, her long body
Rubbed of its plush ----
Poor and bare and unqueenly and even shameful.”


The health of the hive is highlighted (or low-lighted) with the first line of the above section, “Brood cells gray as the fossils of shells” along with “wormy mahogany”. Both of these images are dilapidated and negative.

The Queen’s health is vital to a hive. An elderly one with torn wings and a poor, bare body is a strong indicator that the overall vitality of the hive is lacking.

Then, someone unrelated to her and the bee keeper walks through the garden:


“In eight great bounds, a great scapegoat.
Here is his slipper, here is another,
And here the square of white linen
He wore instead of a hat.
He was sweet,”


Because this man did not wear a protective suit, he was attacked by her bees:


“The sweat of his efforts a rain
Tugging the world to fruit.
The bees found him out,
Molding onto his lips like lies,
Complicating his features.”

He lost his slipper, probably while running from the defensive bees. Those worker bees died when they lost their stingers stinging the stranger, but Plath is more concerned about her Queen. Without the queen, the hive has no future, so she searches for her:


“They thought death was worth it, but I
Have a self to recover, a queen.
Is she dead, is she sleeping?
Where has she been,
With her lion-red body, her wings of glass?”


Finally, she finds the Queen and see she is healthy enough to fly and seems vibrant with the color and adjectives Plath chooses.

Now she is flying
More terrible than she ever was, red
Scar in the sky, red comet
Over the engine that killed her ----
The mausoleum, the wax house.


Now.
2. The way I think it should be interpreted.
Or, Husband, husband, and Me.

I will not enthrall you by re-quoting “Stings,” but I will be referring to the sections I pasted above, so I do hope you read over them.


I am keeping Plath as the speaker (“I”) of the poem, but also as the Queen bee she is searching for.

Both the bee keeper at the beginning of the poem and the man walking by her bee hive are her husband, Ted Hughes. At first I thought the bee keeper was her father, Otto Plath, because he authored a book about bumblebees and was a professor of Biology. That being said, I have no problem reading the beekeeper as her father, but I prefer it this way.

This was another poem written in October of 1962, one month after Hughes and Plath split, about three months after she discovered her husband’s affair. Although Hughes and Plath’s marriage has been shown to be far from perfect, I am sure uncovering an affair would have shattered Plath’s previous view of her husband. This is why I changed my mind about the bee keeper being her father. I thought since Plath is being duplicitous with her character, by being both the bee keeper’s helper and the queen bee, Hughes should also be two-fold. I am sure this was especially true to Plath, seeing that her husband had shifted from being a part of their marriage to an unliked stung stranger, as seen in the second half of “Stings.”

In the first two stanzas pasted far above, Plath and Hughes are over a bee hive, bare handed, with thousands of cells between them. I think Plath is describing the calm before the storm in their marriage. The thousand cells between them is referring to their family they constructed together and are sharing. They could also refer to the poetry both had written. It would not surprise me if, at times, Plath thought poetry more intricate than a family. They are also bare handed, with is dangerous. She is saying what they had worked for, their family or marriage, is not being handled with care. However, even at the end of the second stanza there seems to be a nostalgia note on her part, “With excessive love I enameled it.” She wanted this life, with a family.

The second selection I pasted described that dilapidated hive. I think this is the calm AFTER the storm in her marriage. Before the cells were clean and a healthy yellow, but now they are grey and seem old. After her marriage crumbled, so probably did the rest of her family. Or at least it was perceived that way at times by Plath. By asking, is there a queen, she was asking herself if she was still up for the challenge of raising a family. The forth stanza, describing the old queen, is describing the way she felt after realizing her husband wanted and obtained another woman. She probably felt broken and useless from such a blow to her esteem.
After this moment of self-pity Plath seems to gain momentum as a person through her poetry.

“It is almost over.
I am in control.
Here is my honey-machine,
It will work without thinking,
Opening, in spring, like an industrious virgin

To scour the creaming crests
As the moon, for its ivory powders, scours the sea.
A third person is watching.
He has nothing to do with the bee-seller or with me.
Now he is gone”


By claiming control of the situation, Plath is asserting that she can be over her hive, her family, without her husband. The machine and honey making process she refers to is probably a tip to her writing poetry. If I wrote 25 keepers in one month. . .Well I don’t know what I would do. The third person she mentions is the beginning of the stranger. He, the stranger, has nothing to do with the person who was a part of her marriage. Right after these stanzas are the ones finding the stranger’s clothing. I have no doubt this is literal. Once Hughes moved out I am sure Plath found a sock or two of his in some forgotten and rediscovered box.
Then the bees attack her cheating husband making him unrecognizable. Payback is a bitch. The last stanza, which I kind of promised to not re-quote is below. I do apologize, but it’s so good.

“Now she is flying
More terrible than she ever was, red
Scar in the sky, red comet
Over the engine that killed her ----
The mausoleum, the wax house.”


Plath regains her regal stature through, I believe, poetry and surviving without the wax marriage to Hughes.

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Howl

Part I (read: The Trinity of Spiritual, Street, and Howl Ghost)

Part III continues the discussion brought up in the latter portion of Part I in Howl, specifically the following lines:
"Pilgrim State’s Rockland’s and Greystone’s foetid halls, bickering with the echoes of the soul, rocking and rolling in the midnight solitude-bench dolmen-realms of love, dream of life a nightmare, bodies turned to stone as heavy as the moon,
...
ah, Carl, while you are not safe I am not safe, and now you’re really in the total animal soup of time"
In the first thought stanza or however you call it, Ginsberg introduces Rockland, which as we know he calls back to around nineteen times in Part III of Howl. Since it is mentioned in Part I the reader is already aware of the madhouse setting that is referred to in Part III. Something that also sets these lines apart and makes them special is that they do not start with "who." To me it makes these lines stand out and seem very purposeful. Not saying that some lines in Howl are not purposeful, I believe they are, but changing the beginning word in this section calls attention to it.
The second thought-breath-stanza caught my attention during the first day of discussion. This line, to me and hopefully I am not the only one, is one of transcendence. Finally, one of the best minds achieves this greater state and all he had to do was accomplish madness and coexist with other mad-labeled people. If Ginsberg would have left this part with no continuation it would not have left such a strong impact as it does in Part III.
This feeling of transcendence is one of the spiritual realm, brought up with words like angel headedhippsters and the like, but also one of the street. Madness to a 'normal' person might be more in the realm of the base or street, maybe even under the street.

I am going slightly (read: completely) out of numeric order because Part II (read: Part Moloch) is slightly less obvious of a tie in because "Moloch" is not referenced in Part I by name. Instead we see Moloch behind the terrible happenings and bleak language that appears in Part I:

"incomparable blind streets of shuddering cloud...
yacketayakking screaming vomiting whispering facts and memories and anecdotes and eyeball kicks and shocks of hospitals and jails and wars...
suffering Eastern sweats and Tangerian bone-grindings and migraines of China under junk-withdrawal in Newark’s bleak furnished room,
who wandered around and around at midnight in the railroad yard wondering where to go, and went, leaving no broken hearts...."

And a ton of other lines with dark cloud no rain images that manage to rain on a drug waking nightmare accompanied by alcohol and cock and endless balls. The problem with something that is not blatantly named is that an enemy is hard to find. Luckily in Part II Ginsberg introduces the reader to Moloch. Suddenly it is not an unnamed invisible karma or bad life decision that ruins the best minds of a generation. It is the machine that enters the young soul while it watches PBS- of course!

Switch back to Part III- the answer already mentioned up above. Trinity- Combination of Spiritual, Street, and Howl Ghost. Only the combination of Spritual (transcendence) and street (naked madness) beats up on the Howl Ghost (Moloch). So, let's all go mad together. Only, if we're mad, we wouldn't know that we were.

That is right, you are already on your way.